EVE Search - Sticky:[Odyssey] Navy Battleships

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Sticky:[Odyssey] Navy Battleships

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 8 post(s)
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 839	Posted - 2013.05.13 17:03:00 - [1] - Quote Kagura Nikon wrote: Want to point to you RIse that the current Fleet phoon with PROJECTILES outdamages the tempest with projectiles. That is sad.. and I did not even factor in the better slot layout of the typhoon. BOTH the normal and fleet tempest must be more dangerous for a ship with DOUBLE damage bonus. Currently it cannot outdamage the typhoon, maelestrom, Hyperion, Megatron, armageddon in basiccally ANY relevant range ! The tempest current layout + bonus combination is HORRIBLE! IT you insist on keepign it then it would need to gain at LEAST 100/125 drone bay to match what the typhoon do with 1 single bonus! Phoon is supposed to outgank it... BYDI (Shadow cartel) Recruitment open!
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 842	Posted - 2013.05.14 02:00:00 - [2] - Quote Also i demand you stop releasing new stuff until you fix links <.< BYDI (Shadow cartel) Recruitment open!
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 843	Posted - 2013.05.14 02:59:00 - [3] - Quote Octoven wrote: Tim Ryder wrote: Klingon Admiral wrote: Haven't run any exact calculations yet, but it seems the CNR just brutally murdered the Golem. How do you figure that? The CNR got nerfed, effectively, probably because it'd've been too good with the new cruise missiles. I dont call 8 launchers a nerf >.> Basically ccp decided the Raven should have 3 bonuses. BYDI (Shadow cartel) Recruitment open!
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 846	Posted - 2013.05.15 02:23:00 - [4] - Quote 1. If you think the CNR is bad; you're terrible 2. Navy Geddon maintains its ****** gank while now being able to easily get over 135k ehp.. alright.. 3. Malcanis you shitpost too much, chill. BYDI (Shadow cartel) Recruitment open!
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 847	Posted - 2013.05.15 08:24:00 - [5] - Quote Liang Nuren wrote: Garviel Tarrant wrote: 1. If you think the CNR is bad; you're terrible 2. Navy Geddon maintains its **** gank while now being able to easily get over 135k ehp.. alright.. 3. Malcanis you shitpost too much, chill. In PVE: the new CNR is just outright worse than the Golem In PVP: Why aren't you using a Typhoon or Fleet Phoon again? -Liang In PVE: I would hope so, golems are expensive as **. In PVP: You mean other than the Raven having a much better tank, more range and a better damage application? BYDI (Shadow cartel) Recruitment open!
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 848	Posted - 2013.05.15 08:38:00 - [6] - Quote The ** is wrong with you people. Cruise missiles are getting seriously buffed, Raven is gaining application at the loss of almost no dps and you're complaining that these ships are going to be worse at doing the already [urine?] *** easy lvl 4 missions? Seriously? what the **? BYDI (Shadow cartel) Recruitment open!
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 852	Posted - 2013.05.15 10:28:00 - [7] - Quote Also people complaining about it being similar to the golem are missing the whole "the golem is going to be rebalanced too" thingg I'm hoping Marauders will be made pvp viable. Having a ship specialized for mission running when mission running is so ***** easy is kinda ****. Also the new paladin LOOKS *** DELICIOUS AND I MUST HAVE IT (but i don't PVE) BUT I MUST HAVE IIIIIT RISE, FOZZIE, PALADIN, PVP VIABLE, YES?** BYDI (Shadow cartel) Recruitment open!
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 854	Posted - 2013.05.15 17:11:00 - [8] - Quote Liang Nuren wrote: Malcanis wrote: Listen guys, I understand that some of you were really looking forward to being able to do 1100 DPS at 200km, but there's no way in the real world that the CNR was ever going to be allowed to be that good - and if by some freak of persuasion or oversight it did, then it would pretty soon get nerfed. Some of you were acting like it was a done deal and you were given a firm promise of that level of performance. You weren't. Get over it. The New CNR will be better than the current CNR. If you don't believe me, believe the market; prices are up. The market goes up with any announced change, buff or nerf. You should know that by now. -Liang He's not wrong though. BYDI (Shadow cartel) Recruitment open!
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 857	Posted - 2013.05.16 09:06:00 - [9] - Quote Liang Nuren wrote: CNR The CNR has lost its way. In PVP it's completely outclassed by the Scorp Navy, Typhoon, and Typhoon Fleet and in PVE it's outclassed by the Typhoon Fleet and Golem. The loss of the utility high was pretty bad, but even giving that back isn't going to make a dent in the Fleet Phoon's superiority. As a shield fleet ship the CNR is quite superior to the typhoon fleet.. (I agree with the scorpion but the scorp is also majorly OP so..) I guess i could see it performing worse than the phoon at PVE (Its supposed to be worse than the golem) because of the phoons drone bay but... thats minor imo and i think the raven more than makes up for it in extra mid slots. BYDI (Shadow cartel) Recruitment open!

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.